
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visual Basic 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.leefindlow.com/2007/03/visual-basic-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.leefindlow.com/2007/03/visual-basic-2005/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Leslie</title>
		<link>http://blog.leefindlow.com/2007/03/visual-basic-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leefindlow.com/?p=33#comment-28</guid>
		<description>VB6 is actually the only programming language I&#039;ve ever been properly proficient in - I haven&#039;t used it for about 3 years, though.

One thing I think they changed in VB 2005 is the easy, simple, printing. In vb6 you could go

printer.print = &quot;Text to be printed&quot;

(or similar), and it would print on the default printer. I always thought that was brilliantly simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VB6 is actually the only programming language I&#8217;ve ever been properly proficient in &#8211; I haven&#8217;t used it for about 3 years, though.</p>
<p>One thing I think they changed in VB 2005 is the easy, simple, printing. In vb6 you could go</p>
<p>printer.print = &#8220;Text to be printed&#8221;</p>
<p>(or similar), and it would print on the default printer. I always thought that was brilliantly simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Upfold</title>
		<link>http://blog.leefindlow.com/2007/03/visual-basic-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Upfold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leefindlow.com/?p=33#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve done a reasonable bit of VB 2005 myself actually and it&#039;s a pretty nice language as languages go.

If you do want to build cross-platform applications with .NET though, learn C#. You can&#039;t use GUIs you build in Visual Studio on both platforms, but with a bit of trickery you can make GUI apps for both Windows and Linux with Mono and GTK#. I haven&#039;t tried this myself, though, so I can&#039;t say how easy it is to do.

While I&#039;m on the subject, I have to say that from my little bit of playing around with Objective-C and Cocoa on the Mac, that is a very fine environment too. Unfortuantely it suffers from the same single platform issue as VB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done a reasonable bit of VB 2005 myself actually and it&#8217;s a pretty nice language as languages go.</p>
<p>If you do want to build cross-platform applications with .NET though, learn C#. You can&#8217;t use GUIs you build in Visual Studio on both platforms, but with a bit of trickery you can make GUI apps for both Windows and Linux with Mono and GTK#. I haven&#8217;t tried this myself, though, so I can&#8217;t say how easy it is to do.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m on the subject, I have to say that from my little bit of playing around with Objective-C and Cocoa on the Mac, that is a very fine environment too. Unfortuantely it suffers from the same single platform issue as VB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blog.leefindlow.com/2007/03/visual-basic-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leefindlow.com/?p=33#comment-26</guid>
		<description>VB6 was a nice, cute programming language which cut out the complexities in which Java, C, Python etc... all have. Click, draw, program. That is why I like VB.

However I have not sampled the new edition of VB, mainly due to last time I researched it there was a great lack of resources available. VB6 seemed to have much more documentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VB6 was a nice, cute programming language which cut out the complexities in which Java, C, Python etc&#8230; all have. Click, draw, program. That is why I like VB.</p>
<p>However I have not sampled the new edition of VB, mainly due to last time I researched it there was a great lack of resources available. VB6 seemed to have much more documentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

